Recently I was asked if there would be water monitoring costs to cities or counties because of upgrading our main Suwannee River Basin waters in Georgia from Fishing to Recreational, as we have requested in Georgia’s Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards.
Here’s the answer, as best I could determine.
And how you can help.
For those who wonder why upgrade from Fishing to Recreational, please see the previous blog post.
WWALS Satellite Map of landing in the Suwannee River Basin in Georgia
Specifically the question was:
would reclassifying rivers or swamp from Fishing to Recreational cause cities or counties to have to spend more money on water quality monitoring, specifically if a wastewater treatment plant had a spill, more money on water quality sampling afterwards?
The brief answer is: probably not.
Recently, I asked James A. Capp, Chief, Watershed Protection Branch, EPD.
He said that for that case, there should be no change, because sampling after a spill is determined mostly by the number of gallons spilled.
Let me use some NPDES permits I have on hand to illustrate.
Here is the language in NPDES Permit No. GA0020222 for Valdosta’s Withlacoochee Wastewater Treatment Plant, first about number of gallons, then about the required sampling. Continue reading